The Middle Ground

A GUIDE TO DEAL TERMS IN PLAIN ENGLISH


+ Introduction

+ Purchase and Sale

+ Closing

+ Representations & Warranties - Seller

+ Representations & Warranties - Buyer

+ Covenants

+ Conditions to Closing

+ Indemnification

+ Termination

+ Miscellaneous

Purchase Price Adjustment


Classification: Moderately Material
Section: Purchase and Sale
Negotiation Time: Substantial
Transaction Costs: Insignificant to Intermediate
Major Impact: Risk Management and Deal Value


What is This? Businesses do not shut down operations during the transaction, so there is often a need to adjust the payments after the Closing to reflect the actual state of the Business on the Closing Date. This provision provides a way to make the necessary adjustments.

The Middle Ground: If the parties agree to adjust the Purchase Price based on one or more particular business metrics, the Purchase Price Adjustment section outlines the specifics on how that criteria will be used to adjust the price, and a time period for when the calculations must be made (typically by the Buyer). This section also details how long the Seller has to object to the calculations and, if an objection is made, the procedure for settling the dispute. For example, a popular basis for adjusting the Purchase Price is to calculate the final Working Capital figure, and a popular dispute resolution procedure is to first rely on good faith negotiation and, should that fail, to select a third-party accountant to resolve the discrepancy between the parties. To limit the disputes under this section and encourage resolution through negotiation, the Agreement may also allocate payment responsibilities for the accountant’s fee to the party whose Working Capital figure is furthest from the accountant’s final determination. Often, there is also language included stating that any adjustments to the Purchase Price are being made for tax purposes, unless otherwise required by law.

Purpose: A Purchase Price Adjustment provision functions to ensure that value paid for the Business matches its current value. The magnitude of this provision’s impact depends on the specifics negotiated by the parties, such as which measurement is used to determine the adjustment. Unless there is a massive change in the value of the metric being used to determine the adjustment between the signing and Closing dates, the shift in Purchase Price will not be significant compared to the overall value being transferred. Despite the relative size, Purchase Price adjustments are often heavily negotiated because neither side wants to end up with less value than they give away.

Buyer Preference: The Buyer wants to be the party preparing the evaluation of the metric(s) in question. If the Buyer prepares the evaluation, it will support a scheme whereby the accountant’s fee is paid proportionally based on how close each side is to the accountant’s final determination. That scheme reduces the likelihood for disputes because taking an unreasonable position may lead to higher costs for the party taking that position, and since the Buyer is preparing the evaluation (in its ideal scenario), the Seller is more likely to accept it unless they are firmly convinced that their valuation will be closer to the accountant’s final determination. The Buyer will typically hold a portion of the Purchase Price in an escrow account until the adjustment is made; it will usually want that account to be separate from an escrow account used for potential indemnification claims to make sure that indemnification payments will be made if a claim arises. Finally, if the Buyer anticipates that any adjustment will be in its favor, it can argue for interest to be applied to the adjustment amount.

Seller Preference: The Seller wants to prepare the evaluation on which the Purchase Price adjustment is based. When the Seller is in control it will favor a fee arrangement that discourages the Buyer from challenging its conclusion. Timing of the evaluation may also be an important consideration because the Seller will want the adjustment to be based on the company’s performance while still under its control. The Seller is typically against both an escrow arrangement and applying interest to the adjustment. That is because the Seller generally wants to be paid the entire Purchase Price as soon as possible (i.e. no escrow) and adjustments typically favor the Buyer (i.e. no interest), perhaps because the Seller is more likely to be overconfident about the Business’s future performance.

Differences in a Stock Sale Transaction Structure: None.


DISCUSSION

We want The Middle Ground to be an ongoing dialogue for and resource to the lower middle market M&A community. The outline above is generally applicable, but there is always specific case law and nuance around certain industries that can be useful in helping buyers and sellers come together. If you are a lawyer or deal professional, we encourage you to add your perspective below.